skip to main content
Jackson's Chameleon
This is the three-horned lizard people photograph on a hedge in Kaneohe or above Makawao, and it does nothing at all to a building. It does not bite in any way worth a bandage, carries no venom, damages no wiring, leaves no droppings indoors, and has no documented disease link to people or pets. It matters because of what it eats. Jackson's chameleon is native to the montane forests of Kenya and Tanzania. In 1972 a licensed pet shop owner in Kaneohe on windward Oahu imported several dozen from Kenya, the animals arrived dehydrated and in poor condition, and they were put outdoors, which released them. The species is now established on Oahu, Maui, and Hawaii Island. In 2009 researchers dissecting chameleons collected from endangered tree snail habitat in the Waianae Mountains found the first conclusive evidence that any introduced reptile was eating native Hawaiian animals: 11 native snails in four endemic genera, including four individuals of the Critically Endangered Oahu tree snail Achatinella mustelina, plus native insects in five genera. A follow-up threat assessment measured how fast a chameleon digests a snail shell, applied that to gut contents from field-collected animals, and concluded that at an observed density of 45 chameleons per 2,000 square meters, half an acre, those animals could take 730 to 974 tree snails a year in that space alone. Hawaii lists the whole chameleon family as injurious wildlife, so the obligations attached to this animal are legal rather than structural: do not release one, do not carry one to an island where it is not established, do not ship one off the state. And no, it does not change color to match the branch it is sitting on. That part is a myth.

Seasonal Timeline

There is no seasonal window to work against. Hawaii's climate gives this species no dormancy, and the record suggests no reproductive shutdown either, which is a departure from its native range in Kenya. The cycle that actually matters for finding one is daily: slow and deliberate in the trees through daylight hours, and asleep and conspicuously exposed on vegetation after dark.

The seasonal contrast between the native and the introduced population is the interesting part, and it comes with a stated limitation. In Kenya this is a seasonal breeder. A field study at Karatina recorded parturition beginning in mid-January and running into March, with post-reproductive quiescence from January through March. In Hawaii, a histological study of 88 museum specimens from Oahu found both males and females reproductively active in December and in February, and February is the middle of the native range's quiescent period. The researcher who reported the first predation records also states that Hawaii's tropical climate appears to leave the reproductive cycle without seasonality.

One limitation comes with that. The Oahu specimens came from two calendar months only, December and February, and the study's own authors say plainly that they cannot comment on seasonality from that sample. So the defensible claim is that no seasonal shutdown has been documented in Hawaii, on a two-month sample, supported by a separate field observation of no apparent seasonality. That is not the same as a measured year-round breeding cycle, and it should not be treated as one.

What the calendar does not do here, the clock does. These animals are diurnal, they move extraordinarily slowly, and they sleep out in the open on vegetation at night. In the Hawaii Island diet study, 28 of the 34 chameleons collected were taken at night while sleeping on plants. If you want to know whether a property has them, walk it after dark with a light rather than scanning the canopy at noon.

Where They're Found

In the United States, this is a Hawaii animal.

The introduction is unusually well documented, and it is also disputed. The version in the peer-reviewed record is specific: in 1972 a licensed pet shop owner in Kaneohe on the eastern side of Oahu imported several dozen chameleons from Kenya, the shipment arrived dehydrated and in poor condition, the lizards were placed outdoors, and that effectively released them. The authors call it the first and only known introduction in the state. The state's own species profile describes the same event as an intentional release in Kaneohe. Against both, a later dietary and conservation study reports that hundreds of chameleons born in mainland pet stores were also imported and released at numerous Hawaii localities by a number of individuals in the early 1970s, deliberately, with the intention of building a stock of animals to export back to the pet trade. A separate second-hand report, attributed to a personal communication, holds that all three subspecies were released. The 1972 Kaneohe release is the documented founding event, and additional deliberate releases are reported on top of it, because the two accounts tell different stories about how one pet shop release became a statewide population.

Island by island, the sources genuinely disagree, and the state's current position is the one that determines what a resident should do. The current state invasive species profile says the species has established free-ranging populations on Hawaii Island, Maui, and Oahu, that it has not become established on Kauai or Lanai, and that sightings need to be reported on those last two islands but not on the first three. Kauai's invasive species committee lists it as an active target and notes that it helped the state agriculture department capture one Jackson's chameleon in Lihue in 2013, presumed an escaped pet. The older literature is broader: the 2010 predation paper states that established populations were first documented on Lanai and Kauai in the mid-1990s and that self-sustaining populations are now present on all of the main islands, and the 2014 threat assessment says the subspecies became established on all major islands with the possible exception of Kauai. Both readings are in the record. Follow the current state position when deciding whether to report a sighting, and treat the broader historical claims as unsettled.

Where they actually live is warm, wet, and shaded. In the islands the species is most abundant between about 100 and 1,000 meters elevation, in wet shady habitat where daytime temperatures run 21 to 32 degrees Celsius, roughly 70 to 90 Fahrenheit, and nights run 10 to 20 Celsius, with moderate rainfall. On a property that means trees, hedgerows, and ordinary disturbed suburban vegetation. Field observations on Maui put the average perch 4.5 meters off the ground on perches averaging about 2.4 centimeters in diameter, which is why so many residents live near chameleons for years and see them only occasionally.

The conservation concern is about elevation, not about yards. Chameleons were historically rare in native Hawaiian forest, which is why the animal was long assumed harmless. Then 12 were collected from mid-elevation native forest adjacent to higher-elevation pristine forest where endemic prey are abundant, and the authors warned of possible upslope range expansion with devastating consequences if the species establishes there. Monitoring in native forest continues at roughly 600 to 1,300 meters. What makes that concern concrete rather than speculative is that two separate modeling approaches concluded this species is physiologically capable of colonizing most non-alpine habitat in Hawaii.

One out-of-state population is unconfirmed. A widely used industry compendium datasheet states this species is established only in California and Hawaii, and a California herpetology reference documents naturalized populations in San Luis Obispo County near Morro Bay and in Orange County, tracing the Morro Bay animals to a 1981 escape during a state enforcement action. No state or federal agency source confirms a currently established California population, so treat California as unconfirmed.

Alaska is ruled out on climate. This is a warm, wet, montane tropical species with a documented temperature envelope well above freezing, no Alaska detection record, and no introduction pathway. There is no marginal case to argue.

Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming District of Columbia District of Columbia

HubSpot Contact Form Here (Inside Module)